Global Crypto, Haze Cash and others fall victim of data leaks.

A total of 5 breach events were found and analysed resulting in 3,431,109 exposed accounts containing a total of 5 different data types of personal datum . The breaches found publicly and freely available included Global Crypto, Haze Cash, Fortinet, RBX.Place and Harvest Trolley. Sign in to view the full library of breach events which includes, where available, reference articles relating to each breach.

Data Breach Analysis

The inclusion of Global Crypto and Haze Cash immediately signals heightened concern, as both names suggest involvement in the digital finance and cryptocurrency sectors. Platforms in these industries handle inherently high-value assets, and their user bases often include early adopters, tech-savvy investors, and small businesses experimenting with decentralized finance. A data breach in such a context, even if not directly involving wallet keys or transaction data, can create secondary risks such as phishing attacks, impersonation, and social engineering. Moreover, breaches in this sector can disproportionately impact smaller platforms with lower brand recognition, where trust is a critical but fragile currency.

Global Crypto, by name, implies a platform offering services such as wallet access, exchange functionality, or crypto education. Users on such platforms frequently provide sensitive identification during Know Your Customer (KYC) processes, and they may also reuse passwords across other financial tools. The reputational harm and trust erosion from breaches in the crypto sector is particularly acute, as users tend to migrate quickly in search of more secure or established alternatives.

Haze Cash, similarly, appears to align with fintech or lending services, which might cater to micro-loans, high-risk finance models, or unbanked populations. In these cases, the stakes of a breach often extend beyond digital loss: real-world consequences can emerge in the form of identity theft, credit fraud, or misuse of personally identifiable information (PII) in low-regulation environments. Given the vulnerability of users engaging with informal or nontraditional finance systems, breach fallout can be especially harmful.

The presence of Fortinet in this batch stands out significantly. Fortinet is a well-known name in enterprise-grade cybersecurity, particularly known for its firewall, endpoint protection, and secure networking solutions. While the nature of the breach remains unspecified here, even partial data exposure linked to such an infrastructure provider can have widespread implications. This is not just a matter of user credentials—it could impact IT administrators, network configurations, or VPN gateways for hundreds or thousands of organisations. A breach of this type has cascading potential across a much larger ecosystem of businesses and public institutions that rely on Fortinet hardware or services to keep their systems secure.

RBX.Place, on the other hand, is indicative of the online gaming and digital trading community. Likely linked to platforms associated with game currencies, virtual assets, or player-to-player marketplaces (possibly connected with platforms like Roblox), this type of service is particularly appealing to younger demographics. Such communities are frequent targets for credential theft and scam attempts due to the often high engagement of users, peer-to-peer trading features, and use of real-world currencies in digital economies. Breaches in this category carry implications for account takeovers, unauthorised in-game purchases, and potential targeting of minors with phishing campaigns.

Finally, Harvest Trolley appears to be a retail or e-commerce platform, likely focused on food delivery, groceries, or lifestyle products. Smaller e-commerce platforms are increasingly frequent breach targets, often due to less sophisticated security postures or third-party plugins that introduce vulnerabilities. In many cases, these platforms hold sensitive customer details including shipping addresses, purchase history, and partial payment data, which can be leveraged in downstream fraud or profiling attempts.

What ties all these incidents together is the multifaceted nature of digital identity today. A breach on a crypto exchange might enable access to a password reused on a gaming site. A compromised account on a security vendor’s system might open doors to larger enterprise networks. And an exposed consumer record on an e-commerce platform could be the stepping stone for phishing or fraud campaigns elsewhere. This interconnectedness increases the risk profile of each platform exponentially.

Another notable aspect of these breach events is the relatively low volume compared to some larger incidents previously reported. At just over 3.4 million exposed accounts, these breaches may fly under the radar for mass media attention. However, this number is substantial when considering the potential value of the data exposed, especially in sectors like crypto and cybersecurity. For businesses involved, the reputational cost, compliance ramifications (such as under GDPR or CCPA), and user attrition can far exceed the raw count of affected records.

Moreover, breaches like these underscore the growing need for public awareness around long-tail digital services, those niche platforms and mid-tier providers that users may trust implicitly but that lack the same visibility or resources as tech giants. While larger companies are more likely to issue public disclosures and incident response statements, smaller services often fail to notify users or acknowledge incidents, allowing the risks to compound silently.

The breaches also offer insight into attacker strategy. Rather than focusing on high-profile targets exclusively, malicious actors appear to be adopting an aggregation model, scooping up data from a wide swath of smaller platforms to build larger datasets. These are then weaponised in credential-stuffing attacks, sold in darknet marketplaces, or used in social engineering campaigns across sectors. This technique not only reduces the risk for attackers by avoiding heavily fortified targets but also increases the breadth of data they can collect.

In closing, the analysis of these 5 breach events offers a compact but powerful illustration of how diverse the breach landscape has become. From enterprise cybersecurity vendors and digital currency exchanges to gaming platforms and e-commerce storefronts, few digital services can afford to remain complacent. The interdependencies of digital identity, and the overlap between consumer and professional data, demand a new level of vigilance from both users and platform operators. As breach disclosures continue to rise, the true impact lies not just in the number of accounts exposed, but in the cascading, interconnected threats that follow.